<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photoshop Disasters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cineris.org/blog/2008/03/19/photoshop-disasters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cineris.org/blog/2008/03/19/photoshop-disasters/</link>
	<description>Musings on Electronics and Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 01:02:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hola</title>
		<link>http://www.cineris.org/blog/2008/03/19/photoshop-disasters/comment-page-1/#comment-29106</link>
		<dc:creator>hola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 21:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cineris.org/blog/2008/03/19/photoshop-disasters/#comment-29106</guid>
		<description>yeah the tile in the second one was slanted so that means they used the curve thing on photoshop to make her boobs look bigger... yeahh, nice quote on the picture, it totally goes with you photoshopping your body mmhhhmm ur TOTALLY confident about your body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah the tile in the second one was slanted so that means they used the curve thing on photoshop to make her boobs look bigger&#8230; yeahh, nice quote on the picture, it totally goes with you photoshopping your body mmhhhmm ur TOTALLY confident about your body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noodles</title>
		<link>http://www.cineris.org/blog/2008/03/19/photoshop-disasters/comment-page-1/#comment-29075</link>
		<dc:creator>noodles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 22:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cineris.org/blog/2008/03/19/photoshop-disasters/#comment-29075</guid>
		<description>ahhahah the second one makes sense because the tile is slanted. it means the went in and used a morph tool to bring in her side and make her look curvier... but they forgot to fix the tile afterward..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahhahah the second one makes sense because the tile is slanted. it means the went in and used a morph tool to bring in her side and make her look curvier&#8230; but they forgot to fix the tile afterward..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: french hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.cineris.org/blog/2008/03/19/photoshop-disasters/comment-page-1/#comment-26465</link>
		<dc:creator>french hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cineris.org/blog/2008/03/19/photoshop-disasters/#comment-26465</guid>
		<description>Right, the classic is a classic and the second one nobody gets .hmmmmm.
If you look at the side of the tile in the circled area is diagonal, while the rest of the tiled walls have straight edges</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, the classic is a classic and the second one nobody gets .hmmmmm.<br />
If you look at the side of the tile in the circled area is diagonal, while the rest of the tiled walls have straight edges</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shakakay daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.cineris.org/blog/2008/03/19/photoshop-disasters/comment-page-1/#comment-26442</link>
		<dc:creator>shakakay daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cineris.org/blog/2008/03/19/photoshop-disasters/#comment-26442</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;&quot;]I like the classic one, but I can&#039;t see the quirk in the second... Maybe I&#039;m trying too hard to find it... =/[/quote]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>%name said:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.cineris.org/blog/2008/03/19/photoshop-disasters/#comment-"><p>
I like the classic one, but I can&#8217;t see the quirk in the second&#8230; Maybe I&#8217;m trying too hard to find it&#8230; =/</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lina</title>
		<link>http://www.cineris.org/blog/2008/03/19/photoshop-disasters/comment-page-1/#comment-26379</link>
		<dc:creator>Lina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cineris.org/blog/2008/03/19/photoshop-disasters/#comment-26379</guid>
		<description>I like the classic one, but I can&#039;t see the quirk in the second... Maybe I&#039;m trying too hard to find it... =/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the classic one, but I can&#8217;t see the quirk in the second&#8230; Maybe I&#8217;m trying too hard to find it&#8230; =/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

